Best Embedded Equipment Financing Solutions for B2B Marketplaces

A construction equipment marketplace lists a $175,000 excavator. The buyer has found the right machine, reviewed the specifications and contacted the seller. But the transaction stalls because the buyer needs financing.

Sending that customer away to find a lender creates another step between the marketplace listing and a completed sale.

Embedded equipment financing addresses this problem by connecting an application for a commercial loan or lease directly to the purchasing process.

For B2B marketplaces, the challenge goes beyond displaying monthly payments. Different sellers, equipment types, financing providers and payment arrangements must work together.

Quick Answer: The best embedded equipment financing solutions depend on marketplace structure and geography. APPROVE offers equipment-focused integrations for U.S. platforms, QuickFi supports bank and OEM financing infrastructure, and Mehmi Financial Group provides broker-supported financing in Canada and eligible U.S. markets. Trnsact, TimePayment, DLL and Mitsubishi HC Capital serve additional specialized needs. Verify multi-seller support, integration capabilities, customer costs and payout arrangements before choosing.

What Is Embedded Equipment Financing for a B2B Marketplace?

Embedded equipment financing allows business buyers to explore financing while purchasing commercial assets through a marketplace.

The marketplace provides the purchasing interface. An independent financing provider evaluates the customer and funds an eligible purchase under an equipment loan, lease or another appropriate agreement.

A buyer might select a CNC machine, choose "Explore Financing" and begin an application containing information about the selected equipment and seller.

Depending on the integration, the financing provider may receive the transaction details automatically or through a separate application process.

If the transaction is approved and all funding conditions are satisfied, the approved seller receives payment according to the financing agreement.

The marketplace does not necessarily become the lender or assume the customer's repayment obligation.

However, embedded financing is not automatically the same as a complete equipment marketplace financing system.

A single-seller financing widget may support one purchase from one dealer. A multi-seller marketplace must also consider seller identification, equipment ownership, multiple invoices, payment allocation and refunds.

Mehmi's existing guide to embedded financing for B2B marketplaces explains those underlying transaction responsibilities.

This comparison focuses on selecting a provider capable of supporting the marketplace's financing requirements.

What Are the Best Embedded Equipment Financing Solutions?

The following seven options serve different marketplace and equipment-financing models.

They are compared by publicly documented capabilities and intended use cases, not independently measured approval rates, financing costs or conversion results.

Mehmi Financial Group publishes this article and is included as a provider. Its brokerage program is not equivalent to licensing a standalone financing API.

1. APPROVE — Best for U.S. Equipment Marketplace Integrations

Best suited for: U.S. equipment marketplaces seeking equipment-specific financing through APIs, widgets and participating lenders.

APPROVE is one of the most directly relevant options for digital marketplaces selling commercial equipment.

Its published partnership offering specifically identifies B2B e-commerce platforms, vertical software companies, dealer management systems and lending marketplaces.

The platform provides financing applications, payment-estimate tools, lender matching and financing support.

APPROVE also documents APIs, widgets and white-label options that can connect financing to existing purchasing workflows.

A marketplace selling construction machinery could introduce financing directly alongside an eligible equipment listing.

The buyer can explore financing without starting an unrelated search for equipment lenders.

Strengths

• Equipment-focused financing applications and lender access.
• Published support for APIs, widgets and branded integrations.
• Financing specialists who support transactions from application through funding.
• Relevance to equipment retailers, technology platforms and online marketplaces.

Limitations

APPROVE's published vendor eligibility focuses on U.S.-based equipment sellers. Canadian borrower or seller coverage should not be assumed.

Its equipment-financing integration does not, by itself, establish that every marketplace configuration supports multiple sellers on one financed order.

Assessment: A strong first comparison for U.S. marketplaces focused on financing identifiable equipment purchases.

2. Mehmi Financial Group — Best for Broker-Supported Marketplace Financing

Best suited for: Canadian and eligible U.S. equipment marketplaces seeking financing coordination across different customer profiles and commercial equipment categories.

Mehmi Financial Group's vendor financing program allows equipment sellers and B2B businesses to introduce financing through branded applications, product listings and quotations.

The published program includes application tracking, financing-provider matching, document coordination and support from financing specialists.

Unlike a technology-only provider, Mehmi operates as a commercial financing brokerage and intermediary.

It does not lend its own capital or determine a lender's credit decision.

Instead, the brokerage helps prepare and coordinate requests with independent financing providers.

This distinction matters for marketplaces selling varied equipment.

A buyer purchasing a new packaging machine may fit one financing structure. Another buyer purchasing an older commercial truck may need different collateral documentation, a larger down payment or additional underwriting review.

A brokerage-supported approach can help coordinate those differences without requiring the marketplace's employees to act as financing specialists.

Strengths

• Potential financing sources for different commercial equipment categories.
• Broker-supported application packaging and credit review coordination.
• Branded financing applications connected to the sales process.
• Coverage in Canada and eligible U.S. jurisdictions, subject to transaction-specific restrictions.

Limitations

Mehmi should not be treated as a fully documented plug-and-play marketplace API. Custom API functionality, status webhooks, individual seller accounts and multi-seller payouts must be confirmed for a proposed implementation.

Independent financing providers control final underwriting, terms and funding.

Assessment: Worth evaluating when marketplace operators need flexible financing coordination and specialist involvement, particularly for transactions that are not suited to highly standardized credit decisions.

For a wider assessment of broker-supported programs, see how to choose a business financing partner for vendors.

3. QuickFi — Best for Embedded Equipment Lending Infrastructure

Best suited for: Equipment manufacturers, financing institutions and platforms exploring a deeply integrated digital financing process.

QuickFi offers technology covering equipment financing applications, credit decisions, documentation, funding and servicing.

Its embedded lending solution for banks describes API integration, white-label branding and configurable financing workflows.

QuickFi also operates manufacturer-specific financing programs.

For example, its published SANY equipment financing program demonstrates how digital financing can operate through an OEM-supported equipment sales channel.

The strength of this approach is the ability to connect financing decisions to the equipment purchasing experience while supporting the financing provider's operational requirements.

Strengths

• Equipment-specific digital lending infrastructure.
• Published API and white-label capabilities.
• Application, documentation and servicing functionality.
• Integration models designed for banks and equipment manufacturers.

Limitations

QuickFi's published bank and OEM capabilities do not establish that an independent marketplace can access the same financing products under identical terms.

The company advertises North American operational coverage, but marketplace operators must confirm the actual borrower, seller, asset and financing-product eligibility separately in the United States and Canada.

Assessment: A relevant infrastructure option for larger platforms or manufacturer-led ecosystems with clearly defined financing relationships.

4. Trnsact — Best for Equipment Dealer Networks and Shared Workflows

Best suited for: U.S. marketplaces closely connected to equipment dealerships, commercial vehicle sellers and dealer networks.

Trnsact provides software connecting equipment sales, credit applications, financing providers and compliance-related workflows.

Its platform includes branded credit applications, financing quotation tools, lender routing and digital document management.

Trnsact's model is particularly relevant where the marketplace works with established dealerships rather than individual private sellers.

For example, a commercial truck marketplace could use a connected dealer workflow to help sellers organize financing applications and supporting documents.

The financing activity remains linked to a defined transaction record.

Strengths

• Equipment sales and finance workflow software.
• Lender routing and application management.
• Dealer, lender and OEM collaboration.
• Document and compliance-management functionality.

Limitations

Trnsact is primarily a technology and workflow provider, not a direct equipment lender.

Its published capabilities are designed around equipment dealers and their financing relationships. An operator should confirm whether the platform can integrate with an independent multi-seller marketplace rather than assuming every dealer feature is transferable.

Canadian availability also requires confirmation.

Assessment: Particularly relevant when the marketplace's business model depends on connected dealerships and coordinated financing workflows.

5. TimePayment — Best for U.S. Equipment Leasing at the Point of Sale

Best suited for: U.S. equipment marketplaces or seller networks that want straightforward lease applications connected to product listings.

TimePayment provides equipment financing programs for commercial equipment sellers.

Its published digital sales tools include financing buttons, payment estimates and online applications.

The financing button can carry product descriptions and equipment prices into the application process.

This may be useful for marketplaces offering relatively standardized equipment categories.

For example, a marketplace selling restaurant equipment could introduce leasing options on eligible product listings.

Strengths

• Product-page financing links and applications.
• Equipment lease financing structures.
• Digital application and dealer tracking tools.
• Published website integration options.

Limitations

TimePayment is a financing-provider relationship rather than a neutral multi-lender marketplace.

Operators should confirm whether its dealer-facing tools can support multiple independent sellers, centralized reporting and their required settlement arrangements.

The reviewed offering focuses on U.S. equipment sellers.

Assessment: A comparison option for U.S. marketplaces seeking a direct equipment-financing relationship with relatively simple online integration.

6. DLL — Best for Enterprise Manufacturer Financing Programs

Best suited for: Established OEM ecosystems, national equipment distribution networks and larger commercial equipment platforms.

DLL provides vendor financing programs for manufacturers, dealers, distributors and resellers.

Its solutions include equipment loans, financial leases, fair-market-value leasing, inventory financing and used-equipment financing.

DLL has also publicly described API-based integration of asset financing into vendor e-commerce platforms.

These capabilities are relevant to marketplace operators that have formal relationships with participating manufacturers or dealer networks.

For instance, a marketplace operated by an industrial manufacturer may require financing to be connected to equipment sales, product replacement and dealer inventory programs.

Strengths

• Established equipment-financing infrastructure.
• Experience with manufacturer and distribution-channel financing.
• Multiple financing structures.
• Documented historical API and e-commerce integration initiatives.

Limitations

DLL's published API materials do not establish that its current integrations are available as a standard product for every independent multi-seller marketplace.

Specific U.S. and Canadian platform deployments, commercial minimums and financing structures require direct confirmation.

Assessment: Worth evaluating for enterprise programs with substantial equipment-financing requirements and established manufacturer relationships.

7. Mitsubishi HC Capital — Best for Customized Canadian Equipment Financing Programs

Best suited for: Canadian industrial equipment marketplaces, OEM-linked distribution platforms and established equipment seller networks.

Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada provides vendor and broker financing for commercial equipment.

Its published industrial equipment coverage includes machinery, robotics, forklifts, material-handling assets, manufacturing equipment and related systems.

The company also advertises co-branded and private-label financing capabilities.

A Canadian industrial marketplace may consider Mitsubishi HC Capital when customers require customized loans or leases rather than standardized short-term payment plans.

Strengths

• Canadian commercial equipment-financing experience.
• Customized equipment loans and leasing.
• OEM, dealer and distributor financing relationships.
• Published private-label and co-branded financing options.

Limitations

Mitsubishi's published vendor-financing materials do not establish that a complete multi-seller marketplace API is included.

The marketplace would need to confirm how seller-specific applications, customer records, financing decisions and payouts can be integrated.

U.S. programs should be evaluated through the appropriate U.S. offering rather than assuming Canadian agreements apply across the border.

Assessment: A potential financing partner for Canadian marketplace operators that can accommodate a negotiated integration or referral workflow.

Is Lendio Embedded a Good Alternative for Equipment Marketplaces?

Lendio is worth comparing when the marketplace wants to offer broader business capital alongside equipment purchases.

Lendio Embedded Financing offers a configurable U.S. business-financing marketplace with branded applications, lender selection and API-delivered information.

However, an important product distinction requires attention.

Lendio's current embedded-financing FAQ identifies term loans, SBA loans, lines of credit and revenue-based financing among its embedded products, rather than listing equipment loans as a standard embedded product.

At the same time, Lendio's 2025 announcement involving equipment manufacturer Ricoma describes equipment financing through an embedded marketplace relationship.

That means operators should request confirmation of the precise financing products available in their proposed deployment.

A general business loan does not necessarily create an equipment-specific funding process or guarantee payment to the marketplace seller.

The distinction is explored further in Mehmi's comparison of Lendio Embedded alternatives for B2B firms.

How Should B2B Marketplaces Compare These Financing Solutions?

The first decision is whether the marketplace needs technology, financing providers or both.

A software product may manage applications and lender connections without supplying capital.

A financing company may supply capital but require separate integration work.

A brokerage may help coordinate financing without providing the marketplace with a fully documented, self-service API.

The distinction is important when budgeting an embedded financing program.

The broader comparison of B2B embedded financing platforms also explains why equipment loans, business capital and short-term invoice financing should not be treated as interchangeable.

Does the Solution Support Multiple Sellers?

A single-dealer application may assume that one business sells and delivers the equipment.

Marketplace transactions can be different.

A buyer might purchase an industrial machine from one supplier, automation components from a second supplier and installation services from a third.

The financing provider needs to understand what assets are being financed, who owns them, which costs are eligible and which businesses must receive payment.

Ask whether the provider supports one financing agreement across several sellers or requires separate transactions.

Neither arrangement is inherently wrong, but the process must be agreed before the marketplace makes commitments to sellers.

Can the Financing Platform Integrate With Marketplace Software?

A basic hosted application can be suitable for a marketplace testing customer demand.

Larger marketplaces may need additional functionality:

• Financing applications connected to equipment listings and quotations.
• Seller and transaction identifiers carried into applications.
• Secure customer-data transfer and authorization.
• Status updates for applications, approvals and funding.
• Document collection and outstanding-condition tracking.
• Payout reconciliation and cancellation handling.

An API should also be evaluated for authentication, access permissions, error handling and duplicate transaction prevention.

Do not assume that a provider offering an API can automatically supply all these functions.

Mehmi's point-of-sale equipment financing integration guide explains the operational differences between a hosted financing link and deeper integration.

Who Handles Underwriting and Customer Support?

Determine who is responsible for answering financing questions, collecting documents, reviewing credit and communicating approval conditions.

The marketplace should not have to guess whether an application is waiting for the buyer, seller, lender or technical team.

A strong operating model gives every transaction a clear owner and next action.

The Financing-as-a-Service guide for B2B companies provides additional context on separating software functions from actual credit decisions.

What Do Lenders Review Before Financing Marketplace Equipment?

Financing providers evaluate the business purchasing the equipment and the underlying asset.

Common considerations include the customer's operating history, credit performance, available cash flow, existing debt, ownership, and intended use of the equipment.

The lender may request recent bank statements, financial statements, tax information, identification, corporate records and equipment documentation.

Collateral also affects the financing decision.

A recognizable machine with an established secondary market can present different recovery prospects from highly customized equipment with limited resale demand.

Used equipment may require additional photographs, maintenance records, serial numbers, proof of ownership, valuation or inspection.

A lender may also consider whether the equipment will remain productive throughout the financing term.

Borrowing capacity matters more than the marketplace's financing interface.

A company experiencing ongoing operating losses should not assume a new equipment purchase will solve the problem. Financing may be inappropriate if the additional payment cannot be supported by realistic operating cash flow.

The guide to embedded equipment financing for business customers explains the credit and collateral issues behind those decisions.

Illustrative Example: CAD $160,000 Equipment Purchase Through a Marketplace

Consider a Canadian manufacturing company purchasing a CNC machine from an equipment marketplace.

The machine is listed by Seller A for CAD $160,000.

A separate company, Seller B, charges CAD $20,000 for installation and commissioning.

Assume the financing provider agrees to finance only the machinery, not Seller B's installation services.

Illustrative financing assumptions

• Machine purchase price: CAD $160,000
• Customer down payment: CAD $32,000
• Amount financed: CAD $128,000
• Assumed fixed nominal annual interest rate: 9.00%, calculated monthly
• Term: 60 months
• Payment frequency: Monthly, in arrears, beginning one month after funding
• Separate documentation fee: CAD $700, paid at closing
• Residual or balloon payment: None

The loan is fully amortizing.

The estimated monthly payment is CAD $2,657.07.

Total scheduled loan repayments are approximately CAD $159,424.17, including CAD $31,424.17 in interest.

Including the machinery down payment, the separate documentation fee, the unfinanced installation cost and scheduled loan repayments, the customer's estimated total project cash outlay is CAD $212,124.17.

These totals use the unrounded payment calculation. Actual installments may be adjusted for rounding.

GST/HST, applicable provincial sales taxes, insurance, maintenance, delivery, registration costs and any additional fees are excluded.

This is a mathematical illustration, not a Mehmi offer, customer transaction or verified financing-provider price. The assumed nominal interest rate is not a fee-inclusive APR.

Canadian buyers can explore similar assumptions using Mehmi's equipment financing calculator. Select the loan mode, use CAD amounts and add excluded costs separately. Calculator outputs are estimates, not financing approvals.

How Would the Marketplace Sellers Get Paid?

In this hypothetical structure, Seller A receives the CAD $32,000 customer contribution and CAD $128,000 in financing proceeds, subject to the agreed funding conditions.

Seller B receives its CAD $20,000 installation payment separately.

The marketplace's commission, if any, would be handled under its seller and financing agreements. It should not automatically deduct fees from lender proceeds without the required authorization and contractual arrangement.

The financing provider must also determine when payment occurs relative to machinery delivery, inspection, installation and customer acceptance.

An approval is not the same as released funding.

If the machinery is not delivered as agreed, or the approved asset is substituted, the financing provider may require a revised review.

For additional operational guidance, see how vendors get paid when customers finance equipment.

How Does the Payment Affect the Buyer's Cash Flow?

Assume the manufacturer has CAD $4,000 available monthly after normal operating expenses and existing debt service.

The proposed CAD $2,657.07 equipment payment leaves approximately CAD $1,342.93 before additional equipment-related operating costs.

If available cash falls to CAD $2,500 during a slower month, the business would have a CAD $157.07 shortfall against the equipment payment alone.

That scenario warrants reconsidering the purchase amount, timing, down payment or financing structure.

The correct financing decision must account for expected equipment productivity, customer-payment cycles and existing obligations—not merely whether an application can be approved.

How Much Does Embedded Equipment Financing Cost the Marketplace?

The marketplace's implementation costs and the buyer's financing costs should be evaluated separately.

Marketplace costs may include setup charges, platform subscriptions, integration development, transaction fees, merchant discounts, financing subsidies or support expenses.

Some providers may compensate the marketplace through agreed referral or revenue-sharing arrangements. Those arrangements should be documented and reviewed for applicable disclosure and licensing requirements.

Buyer costs depend on the actual equipment loan or lease.

Review the financed amount, repayment term, frequency, financing charges, documentation fees, security obligations, guarantees, early-payment provisions and total repayment.

A lease may also involve a fixed purchase option, fair-market-value buyout, residual obligation or equipment return conditions.

A marketplace should not present a low periodic payment without explaining material end-of-term obligations.

For Canada-specific branding and commercial arrangements, review white-label equipment financing for Canadian dealers.

For broader pricing and platform considerations, Mehmi's B2B financing platform features and costs guide covers additional implementation questions.

What Happens With Refunds, Returns and Seller Disputes?

This is one of the most important differences between ordinary checkout financing and financing high-value equipment through a marketplace.

An equipment financing transaction may already be funded before a problem is discovered.

The buyer could dispute equipment condition, report non-delivery or seek a partial refund.

The financing provider may hold a security interest in the machine.

Returning funds through an ordinary marketplace refund function may not settle the financing agreement or release the security interest.

Before launch, establish who has authority to approve refunds, how repayments or financing balances change, who returns seller proceeds and what happens if the seller becomes insolvent.

The marketplace should also define whether it is merely introducing the parties or acting as merchant of record.

Those roles can create different contractual, tax, accounting and payment-regulatory responsibilities.

What Changes Between the United States and Canada?

A platform can have one interface while requiring distinct financing arrangements in each country.

A technology provider's cross-border marketing does not establish that the same financing products, documents, credit rules or seller-payout methods operate on both sides of the border.

United States: UCC Security and Commercial Credit Rules

U.S. equipment financing may involve security interests governed by the applicable state's Uniform Commercial Code, along with separate rules for titled assets.

Financing providers may conduct lien searches and file UCC financing statements to protect their interest in the equipment.

Commercial credit decisions are also subject to applicable federal requirements.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau confirms that Regulation B applies to business as well as personal credit, subject to its scope and exceptions.

Marketplace operators should confirm the parties responsible for required disclosures, customer authorizations, adverse-action procedures and applicable state commercial-financing requirements.

For Mehmi specifically, its published U.S. jurisdictional restrictions currently limit applications involving borrowers principally located in California, Illinois, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota and Vermont unless the required authorization or exemption has been confirmed in writing. Additional product-specific restrictions may apply.

These are Mehmi's operating restrictions, not a claim that equipment financing is generally unavailable in those states.

Canada: PPSA, RDPRM, Privacy and Payment Regulation

Canadian equipment financing generally involves provincial or territorial rules concerning security interests in personal property.

Most common-law provinces use Personal Property Security Act frameworks, while Quebec uses a distinct civil-law system, including the RDPRM for relevant movable-property rights.

The marketplace should establish who performs lien searches, registers security and obtains releases.

Privacy rules also require attention when collecting information about individual owners or guarantors.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's meaningful-consent guidance explains the need to identify personal information collected, its purposes and the parties receiving it. Applicable federal and provincial requirements must be assessed.

A further issue arises when marketplaces move money.

The Bank of Canada's supervisory policy for online marketplaces distinguishes marketplaces that use independent payment service providers from those that themselves receive and redistribute seller funds.

Depending on their actual payment functions, marketplaces involved in the flow of funds may fall within the Retail Payment Activities Act and require payment-service-provider registration.

Using an outside payment processor does not automatically eliminate that possibility.

For the broader Canadian implementation context, see embedded financing in Canada for B2B companies.

How Should a B2B Marketplace Launch Embedded Equipment Financing?

Start with the types of transactions already occurring on the platform.

If most orders involve identifiable machinery from one seller, begin with a financing application connected to that transaction.

Do not build an elaborate multi-seller payment system before verifying that financing providers can support the underlying purchases.

A controlled pilot should test a straightforward purchase, a used-equipment transaction, a conditional approval and a transaction involving multiple sellers.

Ask the provider to demonstrate how each case moves from application to documentation and funding.

Track completed applications, qualified offers, accepted terms, funded purchases, administrative costs and the time between final funding conditions and seller payment.

Also track marketplace revenue after financing costs, cancellations and refunds.

A high application count does not necessarily mean the financing program is commercially successful.

Frequently Asked Questions About Embedded Equipment Financing

What Is the Best Embedded Equipment Financing Provider for a U.S. Marketplace?

APPROVE is a logical first comparison for a U.S. marketplace focused on equipment purchases because its published offering explicitly supports equipment sellers, B2B software platforms, APIs and widgets.

QuickFi may better suit a bank- or manufacturer-led financing environment, while other providers offer different operational models.

Confirm financing-provider coverage and seller-payout arrangements before choosing.

Can One Embedded Financing Provider Support Both U.S. and Canadian Buyers?

Potentially, but written confirmation is essential.

The provider must support the relevant borrowers, sellers, assets, currencies and jurisdictions.

A shared application interface does not guarantee that one financing agreement can be used in both countries.

Can a Marketplace Offer Financing Without Becoming a Lender?

Yes, potentially.

The marketplace can introduce financing from third-party lenders, lessors or intermediaries without advancing its own capital.

However, its actual activities may create applicable licensing, registration, privacy, disclosure or payment-service obligations.

Can Embedded Financing Be Used for Used Equipment?

Yes, where the financing provider accepts the equipment and transaction.

Used assets may require additional information about age, hours, kilometres, maintenance, ownership, condition and resale value.

Existing liens or unclear title can prevent funding until resolved.

Is Equipment Financing the Same as B2B Buy Now, Pay Later?

No.

Equipment loans and leases generally support identifiable business assets through financing structures suited to their useful lives.

B2B buy now, pay later commonly provides shorter-term purchase or invoice repayment arrangements.

A short invoice-payment product should not automatically be used to finance machinery intended to remain productive for several years.

Does an Embedded Financing API Guarantee Customer Approval?

No.

An API can transmit applications, supporting documents and financing-status information.

An independent financing provider still evaluates the borrower, equipment, collateral and requested terms.

Automating the application does not remove underwriting requirements.

Who Pays the Marketplace Seller After Financing Is Approved?

The payment depends on the agreed financing and marketplace structure.

A financing provider may release funds directly to the approved seller after required documentation, insurance, down-payment verification and delivery or acceptance conditions are satisfied.

Some marketplaces may require a different approved settlement structure.

Credit approval alone does not establish that the seller has been paid.

Should a Marketplace Offer Equipment Financing or General Working Capital?

Offer equipment financing when the customer's primary need is purchasing an identifiable commercial asset.

General working capital may be more appropriate for payroll, inventory or a temporary operating cash-flow gap.

A marketplace can potentially offer both through separate, clearly described financing journeys, but should not present the products as interchangeable.

Explore Embedded Equipment Financing With Mehmi Financial Group

B2B marketplaces do not necessarily need to build their own lending infrastructure to help customers explore equipment financing.

The appropriate structure depends on the equipment sold, marketplace business model, customer profiles, financing requirements and degree of technical integration needed.

Mehmi Financial Group works with eligible B2B vendors, equipment sellers and platform operators to discuss broker-supported embedded financing arrangements through independent providers.

To evaluate your marketplace's requirements, provide your typical financing amount, whether transactions take place in the United States or Canada, the applicable states or provinces, the equipment and use of funds, and your expected purchasing or implementation timing.

Also identify whether your marketplace involves one seller per transaction or multiple independent sellers.

Call Mehmi Financial Group at 833-863-4644 or contact the team about embedded equipment financing.

Mehmi Financial Group is a commercial financing brokerage and intermediary, not a direct lender. Financing availability, eligibility, rates, terms, documentation and funding depend on independent providers and the applicable jurisdiction.

‍