Kenworth T680 vs Peterbilt 579 | Which Truck Fits GTA Routes?

Comparing Kenworth T680 vs Peterbilt 579 for GTA operations. See spec highlights, driver comfort, fuel economy factors, and the best financing paths.
Kenworth T680 vs Peterbilt 579 | Which Truck Fits GTA Routes?
Written by
Alec Whitten
Published on
September 23, 2025

Quick take

Both the Kenworth T680 and Peterbilt 579 are top-tier aero tractors built on PACCAR platforms (MX engines, similar AMT options, comparable aero kits). In Greater Toronto Area duty—crowded 400-series highways, tight shipper yards, frequent stop-and-go—the “best” choice comes down to spec match + clean uptime history + a payment structure that fits your lanes.
Are you looking for a truck? Browse our used inventory.

What matters in the GTA (ranked)

  1. Aftertreatment reliability for urban idling and frequent regens.
  2. Axle ratio vs. cruise RPM at 95–105 km/h (401/407 corridors).
  3. AMT calibration (creep/low-speed shift logic in traffic).
  4. Visibility & turning for Mississauga/Brampton yards and urban docks.
  5. Aero package (skirts, roof/chassis fairings, bumper close-outs, APUs).
  6. Driver comfort (noise, HVAC, bunk quality) to cut turnover.

Run each spec’s payment impact in minutes with the Calculator.

Head-to-head: fit for GTA work

Factor Kenworth T680 Peterbilt 579 GTA Angle
Engines PACCAR MX-13 common; some Cummins variants PACCAR MX-13 common; some Cummins variants Prioritize aftertreatment paper trail over badge
Transmissions Eaton Endurant/Ultrashift or PACCAR AMT Eaton Endurant/Ultrashift or PACCAR AMT Low-speed AMT logic matters more than brand
Cab & Ergonomics Driver-centric dash; quiet cab Spacious feel; excellent visibility Test both for driver fit/retention
Aero Packages Competitive aero (skirts, roof fairings, close-outs) Competitive aero (skirts, roof fairings, close-outs) Spec full aero for 401 fuel savings
Serviceability Strong GTA dealer network Strong GTA dealer network Pick the unit with cleaner ECM/service history

Bottom line: On paper they’re peers. For GTA operations, pick the cleaner ECM + aftertreatment history, the right axle ratio (often 2.64–2.85 depending on tire size and target speed), and ensure AMT behaviour is smooth in city traffic.

Fuel & drivability: practical, numbers-first guidance

  • Cruise RPM targeting: For direct-style top gears, many fleets aim ~1,150–1,250 RPM at 100 km/h; for overdrive, permissible RPM can be slightly lower. Verify with your tire rev/mile and the final drive ratio.
  • Aero + tires compound: Full aero + low-rolling-resistance tires can swing ~0.3–0.6 MPG (0.13–0.26 km/L). On typical annual mileage, that’s a meaningful fuel-line change.
  • Idle control: High idle % (winter bunk time, yard staging) increases regen counts. Prioritize APUs/idle-reduction and documented DPF/DOC service.
  • AMT creep & hill logic: Toronto traffic punishes clutches; test creep mode, take-off smoothness, and downshift logic on mild grades.

For spec strategy by lane and payload, see our Heavy-Duty Truck expertise and Transportation & Trucking.

Inspection & ECM data: where decisions get made

Before you fall in love with a badge or bunk, verify the data that predicts downtime.

Pre-purchase inspection (both models)

  • Aftertreatment: Pull codes; check DPF ash load, DOC health, SCR/NOx sensors; review regen frequency.
  • Cooling/air: Pressure test, CAC integrity, hose/clamp condition (boost leaks kill economy).
  • Driveline: U-joints, carrier bearing, vibration under load.
  • Brakes/tires/suspension: Even wear, bushing health, air leaks.
  • Electrical/HVAC: Alternator output, battery load test, bunk HVAC performance.
  • Cab & seals: Moisture test; look for prior water ingress.

If day-1 work is needed, spread costs with Truck Repair Financing.

ECM “truth layer” (pull it every time)

  • Active/inactive codes; regen counts; idle %; average speed.
  • Fuel-burn trend (by duty cycle); clutch wear index (AMTs).
  • DPF/NOx sensor counters; evidence of recent resets with matching invoices.
  • Mileage vs. hours (city tractors age by hours).

T680 vs 579: decision cheat-sheet for GTA lanes

Your Priority Lean T680 When… Lean 579 When… Shared Must-Haves
Uptime (DPF/DEF history) Verified DPF service + stable regen counts Verified DPF service + stable regen counts Invoices matching ECM counters
City drivability AMT calibration shows smooth creep & hill logic AMT calibration shows smooth creep & hill logic Test in stop-and-go + docks
Highway economy Right ratio + full aero + LRR tires Right ratio + full aero + LRR tires Target 1,150–1,250 RPM @ 100 km/h
Driver retention Quiet cab + preferred ergonomics Spacious feel + visibility Bunk HVAC & storage that drivers like

Finance it to fit GTA cash flow (don’t overpay for the wrong structure)

Choose the structure that matches how long you’ll keep the tractor and how quickly you need to scale.

Option Best For Cash-Flow Feel End of Term Learn More
Equipment Loan Own & keep 5–10+ years Fixed payments; build equity Own free & clear Equipment Loans
Equipment Lease Lower monthly / upgrade path Residual lowers payment Buy, upgrade, or return Equipment Leases
Equipment Line of Credit Multiple units over the year Draw/repay as needed Reusable facility Equipment LOC
Refinancing & Sale-Leaseback Unlock equity in owned trucks Lump sum + new payment Buyout or upgrade Sale-Leaseback
Trailer Financing Add dry van/reefer/flatbed Keep tractor cash flow separate Ownership or buyout Trailer Financing

If AR is slow on GC/shipper work, keep the tractor on a loan/lease and bridge gaps with a Working Capital Loan or Invoice/Freight Factoring.

24–48h approval checklist (copy/paste)

  • Vendor quote with make/model, year, kms/hours, serials, attachments
  • 3–6 months business bank statements (PDFs; all operating accounts)
  • One paragraph on routes/payloads, start date, expected utilization
  • Insurance broker contact (binder listing lender as loss payee)

Start your file here: Equipment Financing.

Case study (GTA fleet add)

A Mississauga carrier compared a T680 and a 579 for Brampton–Kingston mixed lanes. The 579 had cleaner DPF/NOx history and a ratio that held cruise near 1,150–1,250 RPM on the 401. We modeled a lease with 10% buyout via Equipment Leases, cutting the monthly ~11% vs a comparable loan and reserving cash for day-1 tires using Truck Repair Financing.
Outcome: Zero unplanned downtime in the first quarter; fuel met target.

FAQ

Which is more fuel efficient in the GTA?
They’re both aero leaders; ratio + aero + tires + driving swing MPG more than brand.

Is the PACCAR MX-13 reliable for city/regional work?
Yes—with documented aftertreatment maintenance (DPF cleans, DEF components, sensor history).

AMT or manual for Toronto traffic?
An AMT with good low-speed logic reduces fatigue and protects clutches in stop-and-go.

Can I finance used units?
Yes—see Equipment Loans and Equipment Leases.

What if I need a trailer later?
Open an Equipment Line of Credit and add Trailer Financing.

How do I estimate my payment?
Use the Calculator, then Contact Us for a firm quote.

Verdict for the GTA

Pick the unit with the best history, ratio, and AMT behaviour—not the logo. Then finance it to fit your cash flow so you can scale routes without starving operations.
Browse inventory, model payments in the Calculator, and connect with our credit analysts for a 24–48h approval. Learn more About Us.

Contact Us!
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.