Merchant Cash Advance vs Factoring

Compare merchant cash advance vs invoice/freight factoring in Canada—costs, speed, repayment, and when each fits. See better alternatives.
Merchant Cash Advance vs Factoring
Written by
Alec Whitten
Published on
September 1, 2025

Quick definitions

  • Merchant Cash Advance (MCA): A purchase of future receivables. You get a lump sum today and remit a fixed total payback via a daily/weekly holdback taken from deposits. See Merchant Cash Advance.

  • Invoice/Freight Factoring: You sell your invoices or freight bills for an advance today; the factor is repaid when your customers pay. See Invoice & Freight Factoring.

Side-by-side comparison

Dimension Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) Invoice/Freight Factoring
Speed Very fast with light docs Fast; requires invoices/bills
Repayment % of deposits (holdback) until fixed payback When customers pay invoices
Cost style Factor rate (not APR); can be high Discount/fee on each invoice
Cash-flow impact Daily/weekly debits reduce operating cash Predictable once DSO is known
Best for Emergency needs when time is critical B2B or carriers with slow-pay customers
Common risks Stacking, high effective cost Customer concentration, disputes/chargebacks

Which fits your situation?

Choose MCA if you must fund within days, have strong card/deposit volume, and can tolerate a higher total payback for speed. If predictable, amortizing payments matter more, compare a Working Capital Loan or Line of Credit.

Choose Factoring if cash is trapped in slow AR. It scales with sales, matches trucking and B2B terms, and often costs less than an MCA because repayment rides on customer payments. For fleets, see Transportation & Trucking.

If equipment is the constraint, finance the asset instead: Equipment Loans, Equipment Leases, or unlock equity with Refinancing & Sale-Leaseback. We also sell equipment directly—browse Inventory.

A practical decision flow

  1. Urgency: Need funds in 24–72h? MCA or a quick working capital option.

  2. Receivables: If customers pay on terms, favor factoring.

  3. Collateral & scale: Asset-heavy firms should compare Asset-Based Lending.

  4. Cash-flow model: Use the Calculator to compare MCA holdback vs factoring fee vs amortizing payments.

  5. Exit plan: If you bridge with an MCA, map a path to Business Refinancing.

Case study (Ontario carrier)

A GTA flatbed carrier waited 45–60 days for shippers to pay. Instead of an MCA, they used freight factoring on each load, plus a small Line of Credit for fuel spikes. Cash stabilized, they added a tractor financed via Equipment Loan, then refinanced to lower rates after 12 months.
Are you looking for a truck? Look at our used inventory.

FAQ

Is factoring cheaper than an MCA?
Often, yes—especially if your customers pay reliably; the cost rides on invoice cycles.

Will factoring chase my customers?
Factors handle collections professionally; you remain the relationship owner. Terms vary by agreement.

Can startups qualify?
Yes. MCA can be quick; factoring works if you have creditworthy customers or signed rate cons.

What if my issue is an equipment repair?
Consider Truck Repair Financing or a small working capital facility first.

Can I use both?
Some firms factor AR and keep a small LOC for gaps—avoid stacking multiple MCAs.

How do I compare offers?
Model scenarios in the calculator, then request term sheets. We’ll benchmark cost, cash-flow impact, and covenants.

Next step

We’ll show MCA vs factoring vs loan/lease side-by-side and map a refinance path when you’re ready. Feel free to contact our credit analysts or start with the calculator, then Contact Us.

Contact Us!
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.